Name:
Title:
Organization:
Government International Organization Corporation (Business) NGO University Independent Consultant Other
If other, please specify:
Address:
Country Afghanistan Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia-Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil Brit Ind Ocean Territory Brunei Darussalm Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burma Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Canary Islands Cape Verde Caymen Islands Central African Rep. Chad Chile China Christmas Islands Cocos Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Cook Islands Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Dem Rep. of Korea Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic East Timor Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France France Metropolitan French Guiana French Polynesia French So. Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadaloupe Guam Guatemala Guinea Guinea Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard McDonald Island Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Ivory Coast Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea (South Korea) Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Laos Lativa Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macau Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Mariana Islands Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Micronesia Moldova Monaco Mongolia Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Nambia Nauru Nepal Netherland Antilles Netherlands New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Island Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Island Norway Oman Pacific Islands Pakistan Palau Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Republic of Korea Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda S Georgia & Sandwich Saint Pierre & Miquelon Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Seychelles Sierre Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somali Republic South Africa South Korea Spain Sri Lanka St. Helena St. Kitts-Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent/Grenadines Sudan Suriname Svalbard & Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand Tokelau Tonga Trinidad & Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks & Caicos Tuvalu United States Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom Uruguay US Minor Outlying Is. Uzbekistan Vanuatu Vatican City State Venezuela Vietnam Virgin Islands: British Virgin Islands: US Wallis & Futuna Islands Western Sahara Western Samoa Yemen Yugoslavia Zaire Zambia Zimbabwe (Click here to choose)
Male Female
E-mail address:
General Description The combination of $1 trillion paid in government bribes, over $2 trillion in organized crime, proliferation of terrorism, and the trivial entertainment that floods our minds with unethical behavior cries out for leadership that is far more ethical. Public morality based on religious metaphysics is challenged daily by growing secularism, leaving many unsure about the moral basis for decisionmaking. The speed at which the fabric of life has begun to change seems beyond the ability of most people and institutions to comprehend.
Rapidly advancing technology promises god-like control within our lifetimes, with many unknown ethical implications. Do we have the right to rewrite genetic codes creating thousands of new life forms or genetically change ourselves and future generations into new species? Is it right for humans to merge with technology, as one way to prevent technological hegemony over humanity? Is there a balance between supporting free inquiry and making information available that could cause significant catastrophes? Could the technical means to prevent terrorism lead to e-fascism? Experts speculate that the world is heading for a “singularity”—a time in which technological change is so fast and significant that we today are incapable of conceiving what life might be like beyond that point.
Globalization and advanced technology allow fewer people to do more damage and in less time than ever before. Hence the welfare of anyone should be the concern of everyone. Such platitudes are not new, but the consequences of their failure will be quite different in the future than in the past. Yet new technologies also allow fewer people to help more than ever before as well.
The proliferation of NGOs, global news media, and self-organizing Internet blogs are new forces for transparency, providing some checks on the abuse of power. Switzerland has started repatriating assets stolen by corrupt officials. Transparency International exposes 70 corrupt countries. The World Bank lists unethical companies and individuals on its Web site and has begun producing indicators of good governance and taking them into account in its decisions with governments. Corporate ethics indexes and UN treaties, plus new journals, civil society forums, and multi-religious dialogues, address global ethics in decisionmaking. Over 2,000 businesses have joined the UN’s Global Compact to use global ethics in decisionmaking. The International Criminal Court has tried political leaders, and the world’s two richest entrepreneurs are putting over $60 billion into international philanthropy. The synergies among the more than 16,000 ISO standards improve the ethics in decisions around the world.
Collective responsibility for global ethics in decisionmaking is embryonic but growing. Unfortunately, religions and ideologies that claim moral superiority give rise to “we-they” splits, which is not helping to solve world problems and can make them worse. Collaboration across national and institutional boundaries, as well as religious and ideological ones, seems necessary to address the Global Challenges. Generating the moral will to act across such different systems may require acknowledgment of global ethics. Please suggest edits to this paragraph:
Global ethics must not only correspond to major religious morals, it should also engage both believers and nonbelievers in a new alliance that creates a sense of “being with” all humankind—including “futurekind,” so that we act in the interests of future generations. We need more effective ways to control lobbying, reduce greed and self-centeredness, encourage honor and honesty, promote parental guidance to establish a sense of values, reduce barriers to the freedom of inquiry, encourage respect for legitimate authority, support the identification and success of the influence of role models, implement cost-effective strategies for global education for a more enlightened world, make behavior match the values people say they believe in, and spread the Olympic spirit. A global process should be initiated that leads to an international code of conduct that empowers a multilateral body like the UN to monitor it, including enforcement of international treaties equally among all nations. Wasting time is a reliable indicator of unethical approaches. Please suggest other actions to address this challenge or edits to the ones above:
Thank you for your participation. The results will be sent to you in the 2007 State of the Future in August 2007. Survey conducted by the Millennium Project of the ACUNU